Gig workers and their social protection needs in Georgia
Keywords:
gig worker, transition economy, platform labor, social protectionAbstract
Gig work has become a global phenomenon over the last decade. Gig workers are usually defined as workers who perform short-term, task based work for several organizatins at a time as opposed to traditional long-term employer-employee relationship. This type of work arrangements have been rigorously studied in the context of advanced economies, where it is equated with sub-standard, precarious employment. Being outside of traditional employment relationship it provides workers with no social and employment guarantees. The study of gig workers’ labour conditions and most importantly their social protection needs are rather scarce in low to middle income economies however. The context in the latter case is qualitative different as these countries oftentimes lack well-developed social protection systems. Therefore, while discussion in advanced economies focuses on inclusion of gig workers in existing schemes, in less advanced economies these schemes may not exist at all. Given this background it is of critical importance to investigate the interplay of gig economy and social protection in low to middle income countries.References
Anwar, M. A. and Graham, M. (2021). Between a rock and a hard place: Freedom, flexibility, precarity
and vulnerability in the gig economy in Africa. Competition & Change, 25(2), 237-258.
Beerepoot, N. and Lambregts, B. (2014). Competition in online job marketplaces: towards a global
labour market for outsourcing services. Global Networks 15(2): 236-255.
Behrendt, C., Nguyen, Q. A., & Rani, U. (2019). Social protection systems and the future of work:
Ensuring social security for digital platform workers. International Social Security Review , 72 (3).
Business Media (2022). დაგროვებითი საპენსიო სისტემიდან 40 წელს ზემოთ დასაქმებულთა
% გავიდა - ხელმისაწვდომია https://bm.ge/ka/tv-inner/dagrovebiti-sapensio-sistemidan-40-wels-zemot-dasaqmebulta-42-gavida/28719 ბოლოს ნანახია 03.02.2022
Cerami, A., & Vanhuysse, P. (Eds.). (2009). Post-Communist Welfare Pathways. UK.
Chen, J. (2018) Thrown under the bus and outrunning it! The logic of Didi and taxi drivers' labour and activism in the on-demand economy. New Media & Society, 20(8): 2691-2711.
Clarke, V. & Braun, V. (2013) Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges anddeveloping strategies for effective learning. The Psychologist, 26(2), 120-123.
D'Cruz, P. and Norohna, E. (2016) Positives outweighing negatives: the experiences of Indian crowdsourced workers. Work organization, labour & globalisation 10(1): 44-63.
De Stefano, V. (2016) The Rise of The "Just-In-Time Workforce": On-demand work, Crowdwork, and Labour Protection in the "gig-economy". Geneva, International Labour Office.
Eisenmeier, S. (2018) Ride-sharing platforms in developing countries: effects and implications in Mexico City. Pathways for Prosperity Commission, Background Paper Series, no. 3. Oxford, United Kingdom.
EMC (2017). შრომის ინსპექტირების მექანიზმის შეფასება და დასაქმებულთა შრომითი უფლებების მდგომარეობა საქართველოში. ხელმისაწვდომია: https://socialjustice.org.ge/ka/products/kvleva-shromis-inspektirebis-mekanizmis-shefaseba-da- dasakmebulta-shromiti-uflebebis-mdgomareoba-sakartveloshi (ბოლოს ნანახია 02.12.2021).
Fanggidae, V., Sagala, M., Ningrum, D. and Prakarsa, P. (2016) On-Demand transport workers in Indonesia. Toward understanding the sharing economy in emerging markets. JustJobs Network: Transformations in Technology, Transformations in Work.
Friedman, G. (2014) Workers without employers: shadow corporations and the rise of the gig economy. Review of Keynesian Economics 2(2): 171-188.
Hall, J., & Krueger, A. (2015, January). An Analysis of the Labor Market for Uber's Driver-Partners in the United States. US: Princeton University .
Human Rights Monitoring & Education Centre (EMC) (2017) Assessing the labour inspection mechanism and worker rights in Georgia. Tbilisi.
Human Rights Monitoring & Education Centre (EMC) (2020) Labour Market Segmentation and Informal Labour During Crisis. Tbilisi
Hunt, A., Samman, E., Tapfuma, S., Mwaura, G., Omenya, R. and Kim, K. (2019) Women in the gig economy. Paid work, care and flexibility in Kenya and South Africa. Overseas Development Institute.
ILO, I. L. (2018). Work on Digital Labour Platforms in Ukraine. Kiev: International Labour Office.
Kuttner, R. (2013) The Task Rabbit Economy. The American Prospect. October 10, ხელმისაწვდომია https://prospect.org/power/task-rabbit-economy/ ბოლოს ნანახია 03.02.2022
Mitchell A., O. (2011). Out-liberalizing the EU: pension privatization in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy , 899-917.
Palier, B. (2019) Work, social protection and the middle classes: What future in the digital age? International Social Security Review, Vol. 72(3): 113-133.
Pascale, C. (2011). Cartographies of knowledge: Exploring qualitative epistemologies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Shevchuk, A., Strebkov, D. and Davis, S. N. (2019) The Autonomy Paradox: How Night Work Undermines Subjective Well-Being of Internet Based Freelancers. ILR Review 72(1): 75-100.
Surie, A. and Koduganti, J. (2016) The Emerging Nature of Work in Platform Economy Companies in Bengaluru, India: The Case of Uber and Ola Cab Drivers. E-Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies 5(3).
UN Women (2020) Assessment of the Social Protection System in Georgia. Final Report. ხელმისაწვდომია https://georgia.unwomen.org/en/digital- library/publications/2020/12/assessment-of-the-social-protection-system-in-georgia#view (ბოლოს ნანახია 03.02.2022).
Valente, E., Patrus, R. and Guimaraes, R. C. (2019) Sharing economy: becoming an Uber driver in a developing country. Revista de Gastao 26(2): 143-160.
Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V. and Hjorth, I. (2019) Good Gig, Bad Gig: Autonomy and Algorithmic Control in the Global Gig Economy. Work, Employment and Society 33(1): 56-75.
გონგაძე, თ. ჯოხაძე, ლ. ეგრისელაშვილი, ლ. დოლაბერიძე, ნ. (2018). - სწრაფი კვების ობიექტები - შრომის პირობების კვლევა. ხელმისაწვომია:
http://gtuc.ge/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/kvleva-new.pdf (ბოლოს ნანახია 23.03.2022).
საქართველოს ეკონომიკისა და მდგრადი განვითარების სამინისტრო (2020). უნარებზე საწარმოთა მოთხოვნის კვლევა. ხელმისაწვდომია: http://www.lmis.gov.ge/Lmis/Lmis.Portal.Web/Handlers/GetFile.ashx?Type=Survey&ID=7d9ca 7cd-cc1b-45ed-9f8f-394b060d9abe (ბოლოს ნანახია 02.02.2022).
საქართველოს მთავრობა (2018) რეგულირების გავლენის შეფასება დაგროვებით საპენსიო რეფორმაზე. ხელმისაწვდომია: http://www.economy.ge/uploads/files/2017/reformebi/regulirebis_gavlenis_shefaseba_dagroveb it_sapensio_reformaze.pdf (ბოლოს ნანახია 02.12.2021).
საქართველოს პროფკავშირების გაერთიანება (2018). - სუპერმარკეტებში დასაქმებულთა მდგომარეობის გამოკვლევა. ხელმისაწვდომია:
http://gtuc.ge/%e1%83%a9%e1%83%95%e1%83%94%e1%83%9c%e1%83%a1-%e1%83%a8%e1%83%94%e1%83%a1%e1%83%90%e1%83%ae%e1%83%94%e1%83%91/publications/ (ბოლოს ნანახია 23.03.2022).
სტატისტიკის ეროვნული სამსახური (2020). დასაქმება და ხელფასები. ხელმისაწვდომია: https://www.geostat.ge/en/modules/categories/39/wages (ბოლოს ნანახია 02.12.2021).
სიჭინავა, დ. აჭაიძე, მ. (2020) მინიმალური ხელფასი საქართველოში, საზოგადოებრივი აზრის კვლევა. ფრიდრიხ ებერტის ფონდი. ხელმისაწვდომია: http://library.fes.de/pdf- files/bueros/georgien/16227.pdf (ბოლოს ნანახია 02.12.2021).
EMC (2017). შრომის ინსპექტირების მექანიზმის შეფასება და დასაქმებულთა შრომითი უფლებების მდგომარეობა საქართველოში. ხელმისაწვდომია: https://socialjustice.org.ge/ka/products/kvleva-shromis-inspektirebis-mekanizmis-shefaseba-da- dasakmebulta-shromiti-uflebebis-mdgomareoba-sakartveloshi (ბოლოს ნანახია 02.12.2021).
ჭანტურიძე, გ. (2021). ციფრულ შრომით პლატფორმებზე დასაქმებულთა უფლებები. ხელმისაწვდომია:
http://gtuc.ge/%e1%83%a9%e1%83%95%e1%83%94%e1%83%9c%e1%83%a1-%e1%83%a8%e1%83%94%e1%83%a1%e1%83%90%e1%83%ae%e1%83%94%e1%83%91/publications/ (ბოლოს ნანახია 23.03.2022).